Science targeted individuals may find interesting: Thermal Inkjet Printing in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Here is some science I thought other targeted individuals may find interesting

Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formula
Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 1, 2013.Published in final edited form Thermal Inkjet Bioprinting

With the advantages of high throughput, digital control, and highly accurate placement of cells and biomaterial scaffold to the desired 2D and 3D locations, bioprinting has great potential to develop promising approaches in translational medicine and organ replacement. The most recent advances in organ and tissue bioprinting based on the thermal inkjet printing technology are described in this review.
Bioprinting has no or little side effects to the printed mammalian cells and it can conveniently combine with gene transfection or drug delivery to the ejected living systems during the precise placement for tissue construction.
With layer-by-layer assembly, 3D tissues with complex structures can be printed using scanned CT or MRI images. Vascular or nerve systems can be enabled simultaneously during the organ construction with digital control. Therefore, bioprinting is the only solution to solve this critical issue in thick and complex tissues fabrication with vascular system. Collectively, bioprinting based on thermal inkjet has great potential and broad applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. This review article introduces some important patents related to bioprinting living systems and the bioprinting in tissue engineering field.

The isolated autologous cells are expanded in monolayer and then seeded onto porous biodegradable scaffolds.

A bioreactor is usually required to culture the fabricated organ construct in vitro before it can be implanted back to the human body. This approach has generated some significant successes in constructing avascular, aneural, alymphatic, thin, and hollow organs

These engineered tissues are nourished by the diffusion from host vasculature; however, the most demanding organs for transplantation (> 90%) are thick and complex organs, such like kidney, liver, and heart (OPTN & SRTR Annual Data Report 2010). When the thickness of the engineered tissue exceeds to 150–200µm, it will surpass the oxygen diffusion limitation. Therefore, functional vasculatures must be created into the fabricated tissues to supply the cells with oxygen and nutrients, and also to remove the waste products from the cells

However, the conventional tissue engineering approach is not capable to create these thick and complex tissues due to these limitations:
The cell seeding and penetration is not effective to the pre-formed scaffold. Tissue formation or maturation is not uniform throughout the scaffold on the time scale of months. Although scaffold design has been significantly improved for effective cell seeding and migration, the approaches are still far from optimal

Multiple cell types are usually required to fabricate organs with complex structure. However, the precise placement of cells and growth factors in 3D is still far from being resolved.

Vascular or microvascular system is crucial for thick and complex tissue engineering which must be fabricated simultaneously with scaffold construction. However, the traditional approach is not able to construct the vascular system with pre-designed 3D patterns.
One promising approach to solve these critical limitations for tissue engineering is bioprinting based on thermal inkjet printing technology, which is a combination of solid freeform fabrication and precise cell placement in 2D and 3D. There are quite a few patents regarding printing biological systems recently and some of them are applicable for tissue engineering approaches

Inkjet printing is a non-contact printing technique that reproduces digital pattern information onto a substrate with tiny ink drops

There are thermal, piezoelectric, and electromagnetic approaches to create drops on demand

Most inkjet printers employ heat or mechanical compression to eject ink drops. In thermal inkjet printers, small air bubbles generated by heating in the printhead collapse to provide pressure pulses to eject ink drops with various volumes from 10 to 150 pL out of the nozzle

The size of droplets varies due to the applied temperature gradient, frequency of current pulse, and ink viscosity

As for the piezoelectric inkjet printers, the actuator of polycrystalline piezoelectric ceramic in each nozzle provides the transient pressure to eject the ink drops onto the substrate

These inkjet printing technologies have been widely used in electronics and micro-engineering industries for printing electronic materials and complex integrated circuits

Recently, inkjet printing has also been successfully applied in biomedical field. Although biological molecules and structures are usually assumed to be fragile and sensitive, DNA molecules have been directly printed onto glass slides using commercial available inkjet printers for high-density DNA microarray fabrication

Challenges still exist when using inkjet printers to print mammalian cells. The well-documented damage to the cell membrane and cell lysis after sonification at 15–25 kHz is within the range of frequencies employed by piezoelectric inkjet printers

As for thermal inkjet printers, although the heating element in each nozzle raises the local temperature to 300°C and lasts for a few microseconds during printing ejected mammalian cells are heated for only 2 µs with a temperature rise of 4–10°C above ambient and an average cell viability of 90%

Therefore, thermal inkjet printing technology is more biocompatible to the living system comparing to piezoelectric printing. Furthermore, the thermal inkjet printers are usually more convenient than piezoelectric inkjet printers in terms of modification, access, and maintenance. Therefore, many research groups including us are utilizing thermal inkjet printers for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications

FEASIBILITY OF MAMMALIAN CELL PRINTING USING THERMAL INKJET
A number of other bioprinting approaches are currently available using various mechanisms, however, these approaches either have difficulties to manipulate singe cell which is critically important for neuron regeneration and fabricating tissues requiring a higher degree of cell organization for specific anatomic structures
or time consuming with low throughput

Instead of moving the cells directly, biological laser printing uses laser energy to vaporize the solution of biological samples and eject the remaining substances

a id=”__tag_306306910″ class=”bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip jig-ncbipopper” href=”http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565591/#R34″>34%5D.
However, this technology may cause over-drying leading to the failure for biological systems. The high cost of these systems is also a concern for basic tissue engineering research. By contrast, bioink prepared for thermal inkjet printing is usually water based in order to minimize the clogging of the printhead. This allows the printer to freely deliver cells from single cell to multiple cells by simply adjusting the bioink concentration and the printed patterns. Cells are always maintained and protected in an aqueous environment during the thermal printing process therefore it is assumed to be safe to deliver living systems.

Although thermal inkjet printing technology has been applied for cell printing in many applications, there are similar concerns that the printing process may cause cell death or damages. In order to maintain the printing resolution, the sizes of nozzles in the printhead are usually very small. For a Hewlett Packard (HP) Deskjet 500 thermal inkjet printer with 300 dpi printing resolution, the diameter of the nozzle channel is 48 µm [35]. Smaller nozzle size is required for higher printing resolution. Due to the thermal heat and mechanical stress applied to the cells when they pass through the narrow nozzles, it is possible that the cell membrane or cellular phenotype may be damaged or altered in the printed cells [36]. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of cell viability, apoptosis, heat shock proteins expression, cell membrane pore sizes and cellular repair process of the printed cells is highly important to clear the potential obstacles to apply this technology. Using the modified HP printer mentioned above, the viability of printed mammalian cells at different cell concentration was varying from 85% to 95%. There was no significant difference in apoptosis ratio and heat shock protein expression level between printed and non-printed cells [29]. By adjusting the cell concentration in bioink, we can control the cell number in individual ejected ink drop. Therefore, inkjet printing can be applied in quantitative cell seeding. Cell membrane pores were observed in printed cells with dextran dye penetration study. Previous observations showed that dextran dye with molecular weight (MW) up to 40,000 was found in the printed cells. No dextran dye was found in the non-printed cells even with the lowest MW (3,000). The cell membrane pore size of printed cells was estimated as 105 Å according to the Stokes diameter of these dye molecules [29].

The pores developed during printing were transient and could be repaired by the cells in 2 hours. The transient nature of the cell membrane pores can be utilized for targeted gene delivery during the printing process [29, 37].

These observations confirm that the inkjet printing process does minor effect to the cells and the benign side effect to the cells during the printing process has the potential for simultaneous gene transfection and drug delivery when depositing cells.

4. DIRECT HUMAN CARTILAGE REPAIR USING 3D INKJET PRINTING

Cartilage defects resulting from osteoarthritis (OA), aging, and joint injury are a major cause of joint pain and chronic disability [38]. Without blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatics, mature cartilage cannot heal spontaneously. The most common clinical treatments for cartilage repair include autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), microfracture, and osteochondral transfer. All of these approaches are highly invasive, complicated, and do not restore the long lasting healthy cartilage [39]. Although cell transplantation based tissue engineering approaches for human cartilage repair was introduced almost two decades ago [40], the current cartilage tissue engineering strategies still cannot fabricate new tissue that is indistinguishable from native cartilage with respect to zonal organization, extracellular matrix (ECM) composition, and mechanical properties [41]. Furthermore, most current strategies of knee cartilage repair involve a procedure of removing healthy cartilage tissue around the lesion site to create artificial defects for further treatment or implantation [42]. This procedure in fact causes additional necrosis to the existing cartilage tissue and it is believed to lead to ultimate cartilage degeneration and failure of implanted tissue [43].

Direct cartilage repair with engineered tissue closely mimicking native cartilage to the site of the lesion without any additional damage to the existing healthy tissue is therefore very attractive. The ideal implanted tissue is expected to integrate with existing native cartilage and to repair lesions of different sizes and thicknesses. The multifaceted nature of this challenge requires a technique adaptable to variable physical dimensions and properties for tissue repair; bioprinting technology, based on inkjet printing, provides the necessarycapabilities.

Synthetic hydrogels formulated from poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) macromers have been demonstrated to maintain chondrocyte viability and induce ECM deposition in proteoglycans and type II collagen [44, 45]. The compressive modulus of PEG hydrogel is tunable to match that of human cartilage [46]. In addition, PEG is water soluble with low viscosity and can be modified to be photocrosslinkable, which makes it attractive for direct printing with simultaneous polymerization during printing. A standard thermal inkjet printer was modified to precisely deposit human articular chondrocytes and poly(ethylene) glycol dimethacrylate (PEGDMA; MW, 3400) layer-by-layer into a cartilage defect within an osteochondral (OC) plug (3D biopaper) for cartilage repair (Fig. 1). For a representative defect of 4 mm diameter and cartilage thickness of 2 mm, a nominal 0.23 µL of bioink estimated to contain 1140 human chondrocytes (5×106 cells/mL) was printed and photopolymerized for each layer to repair the cartilage defect in a layer-by-layer assembly. The thickness of each printed layer was about 18 µm. Total firing time of printhead was 1.1 sec and the whole printing process completed in 108 sec. Compared to manual zonal cartilage fabrication which requires at least 11 min for UV exposure [47], bioprinting reduced UV exposure to cells by 80%. The viability of human chondrocytes printed with simultaneous photopolymerization was 89.2×3.6% (n = 3), compared to cell viability of 63.2×9.0% (n = 3) when exposed to the same UV light source continuously for 10 min in PEGDMA for manual fabrication [48].

Figure 1

Schematic of bioprinting cartilage with simultaneous photopolymerization process (adapted from [41]).

The printed PEG gel remained bound firmly to the native tissue in the defect even after sectioning. An even distribution of printed human chondrocytes was obtained in the 3D PEGDMA hydrogel with simultaneous polymerization during printing. By contrast, when photopolymerization was performed after printing, the deposited chondrocytes accumulated at the zonal interface instead of their originally deposited positions due to gravity [48]. This accumulation of cells at zonal interfaces was also observed in previous reports of manually fabricating zonal cartilage [47, 49].

Printed cartilage implant attached firmly with surrounding tissue and greater proteoglycan deposition was observed at the interface of implant and native cartilage in Safranin-O staining. Printed cartilage in 3D biopaper had elevated glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content comparing to that without biopaper when normalized to DNA. These observations were consistent with gene expression results [48]. This study indicates the importance of direct cartilage repair and bioprinting successfully controlled placement of individual cells, preserved cell viability, maintained chondrogenic phenotype, and demonstrated integration with host tissue.

5. GROWTH FACTORS STIMULATE PRINTED NEOCARTILAGE FORMATION

Although bioprinting is promising to engineer zonal cartilage, previous observations showed significantly higher ECM production with initial cell seeding density at 10–20×106 cells/mL for cell based cartilage tissue engineering with bovine chondrocytes [49] and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [50]. However, the maximum cell density for bioprinting is restricted as the optimal printing resolution is only achieved with bioink at or lower than 8×106 cells/mL [29]. These observations raise concerns that optimal cell densities for cartilage tissue engineering cannot be achieved using bioprinting approaches. Insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS+) based medium supplemented with 10ng/mL transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is commonly used to maintain chondrocyte chondrogenic phenotype in 3D culture [51]. Although TGF-β1 supplemented medium seems sufficient to induce persistent expression of chondrogenic ECM proteins, it is not as efficient for chondrocyte expansion [52]. Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) supplemented medium has been shown to be beneficial for chondrocyte monolayer expansion as well as the chondrogenic capacity in terms of ECM synthesis and chondrocyte specific phenotype expression [5355]. We tested the role of these growth factors in chondrocyte proliferation and ECM production for the first time in bioprinted cell-laden 3D hydrogels. A successful approach would stimulate cell proliferation in 3D hydrogel without delaying neocartilage formation. The bioprinted samples were treated with FGF-2 for the first week and all samples were then cultured with standard chondrogenic medium. The FGF-2/TGF-β1 treated samples demonstrated 40% more cell proliferation compared with TGF-β1 treated group. Therefore, the FGF-2/TGF-β1 synergistic treatment, made the initial 8×106 cells/mL seeding density equivalent to a seeding density of over 11×106 cells/mL [56]. This is within the range of cell seeding density for optimal ECM production for cartilage tissue engineering [49, 50]. Thus, proper growth factors stimulation induced cell proliferation and more chondrogenic ECM deposition in bioprinted cartilage tissue while maintained the high printing resolution.

A major challenge constraining the clinical translation of autologous cell-based cartilage repair is the limited source of chondrocytes available during biopsy. A method of expanding cells after bioprinting to the density required for optimal tissue engineering without compromising the quality of the matrix is extremely valuable. One attractive approach is to directly implant harvested autologous chondrocytes or mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for cartilage repair without in vitro expansion. Furthermore, in order to maximize the advantage of bioprinting which delivers cells, growth factors, and biomaterial scaffold precisely to the desired 3D position, limiting initial cell density will greatly optimize the delivery precision. Therefore, the approach developed here will be particularly valuable to supplement our bioprinting to deliver cells with optimal resolution in combination with spatially arranged growth factor gradients to fabricate cartilage tissue that recapitulates the zonal architecture of native tissue.

6. HUMAN MICROVASCULATURE FABRICATION

The current tissue engineering paradigm is that successfully engineered thick tissues must include vasculature. As biological approaches alone, such as VEGF, have fallen short of their promises, one may look for an engineering approach to build microvasculature. Layer-by-layer approaches for customized fabrication of cell/scaffold constructs have shown some potential in building complex 3D structures [57]. With the advent of cell printing, one may be able to build precise human microvasculature with suitable bioink. Human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC) and fibrin were utilized as bioink for microvasculature construction [58].

Endothelial cells form the whole inner lining of cardiovascular system and have a remarkable capacity to adjust their number and arrangement to suit local requirements. Most tissues depend on a blood supply and the blood supply depends on endothelial cells. Endothelial cells are the only cells to form capillaries and create an adaptable life-support system spreading into almost every region of the body. Endothelial cells extending and remodeling the network of blood vessels makes it possible for tissue growth and repair (angiogenesis) [59].

Fibrin plays a significant role in natural wound healing. Fibrin gel has been widely used as sealant and adhesive during surgery. Fibrin Glue is used as skin grafts and tissue engineered skin replacements [60]. Fibrin can be produced from the patients’ own blood and used as an autologous scaffold for tissue engineering [61]. Fibrin can be polymerized using fibrinogen and thrombin solutions at room temperature [62]. Fibrin gels might promote cell migration, proliferation, and matrix synthesis through the incorporation of the transforming growth factor β and platelet derived growth factors [63]. Fibrin has also been utilized in tissue engineering to engineer tissues with skeletal muscle cells [64], smooth muscle cells [65], and chondrocytes [66].

A standard inkjet printer was modified to simultaneously deposit human microvascular endothelial cells and fibrin to form the microvasculature (Fig. 2). The bioink and biopaper components for fibrin bioprinting were carefully evaluated for optimal condition of simultaneous deposition of cells and scaffold [58]. HMVEC with 50 unit/ml thrombin and 80 mM Ca2+ in PBS was used as bioink to print onto 60 mg/ml fibrinogen hydrogel (biopaper). The samples were incubated for 10 to 15 minutes after the printing to finalize the enzymatic crosslinking and cell attachment.

Figure 2

Schematic drawing of postulated mechanism for simultaneous deposition of HMVEC and fibrin channel scaffold using modified thermal inkjet printer. When bioink is printed into fibrinogen substrate to form fibrin channel, the cells in the bioink are deposited

After 3 weeks in culture, the printed HMVEC aligned themselves in the fibrin channel and proliferated to form a confluent lining. Confocal series images at the z-axis demonstrated tubular structure of the printed human microvasculature. The endothelial cells were forming a channel or tubular structure in the printed fibrin channel [58]. This shows the printed and proliferated endothelial cells processed the critical angiogenesis function and the simultaneous deposition of endothelial cells and fibrin using thermal inkjet printing technology can be used for human microvasculature fabrication.

7. CURRENT & FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

Taken together, bioprinting based on thermal inkjet printing technology demonstrated feasibility of printing living systems and the benign effects to the printed cells can in fact be used for more attractive applications, such like gene transfection and drug delivery. The printing system is versatile for 2D and 3D tissue application as well as avascular and vascular tissue printing. One promising clinical application is to develop a hand-held printer or printhead with digital control for direct tissue repair. By using 3D reconstructions of scanned lesions, bioprinting is able to precisely deliver cells, growth factors, and biomaterial scaffolds to repair the lesion with various shape and thickness with digital control. The successful application in microvasculature fabrication also revealed the bioprinting may be the ultimate solution to engineer thick tissues with complex vasculature and innervation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge M.G. Finn, Delphine Dean, Kurt Breitenkamp for constructive suggestions and technical support. This work was funded by the NIH (AG007996), CIRM (TR1-01216), STSI (UL1 RR025774), NSF (1011796, EEC 0609035, EFRI).

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest related to the work presented in this article.

REFERENCES

1. Jain KK. Stem cell technologies in regenerative medicine. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2002;2:771–773. [PubMed]
2. Alvarez A, Unda F, Canavate ML, Hilario E. Stem cell and regenerative medicine. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2009;4:287–297. [PubMed]
3. O’Brien T, Barry FP. Stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:859–861. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Lysaght MJ, Jaklenec A, Deweerd E. Great expectations: Private sector activity in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and stem cell therapeutics. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14:305–315. [PubMed]
5. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue Engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–926. [PubMed]
6. Jain RK, Au P, Tam J, Duda DG, Fukumura D. Engineering vascularized tissue. Nature Biotechnol. 2005;23:821–823. [PubMed]
7. Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ, Retik AB. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet. 2006;367:1241–1246. [PubMed]
8. Levenberg S, Rouwkema J, Macdonald M, Garfein ES, Kohane DS, Darland DC, et al. Engineering vascularized skeletal muscle tissue. Nature Biotechnol. 2005;23:879–884. [PubMed]
9. Ma PX, Choi JW. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds with well-defined interconnected spherical pore network. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:23–33. [PubMed]
10. Kang HW, Park JH, Kang TY, Seol YJ, Cho DW. Unit cell-based computer-aided manufacturing system for tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2012;4 015005. [PubMed]
11. Hu C, Uchida T, Tercero C, Ikeda S, Ooe K, Fukuda T, et al. Development of biodegradable scaffolds based on magnetically guided assembly of magnetic sugar particles. J Biotechnol. 2012 [PubMed]
12. Nerem RM, Seliktar D. Vascular tissue engineering. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2001;3:225–243. [PubMed]
13. Boland T, Wilson WC, Xu T. Ink-jet printing of viable cells. US20040237822A1. 2004
14. Sun W, Chang RC, Starly B, Nam J. Bioprinting three-dimensional structure onto microscale tissue analog devices for pharmacokinetic study and other uses. US20090263849A1. 2009
15. Forgacs G, Marga FS, Norotte C. Self-assembling multicellular bodies and methods of producing a three-dimensional biological structure using the same. US20100041134A1. 2010
16. Ringeisen BR, Pirlo RK, Wu PK. Cell and biofactor printable biopapers. US20110269207A1. 2011
17. Sun W, Snyder J, Chang R, Ylldirim E, Fridman A, Ayan H. Compositions and methods for functionalized patterning of tissue engineering subsrates including bioprinting cell-laden constructs for multicompartment tissue chambers. US20110136162A1. 2011
18. Yoo SS. 3-dimensional multi-layered hydrogels and methods of making the same. US20110212501A1. 2011
19. Mohebi MM, Evans JRG. A drop-on-demand ink-jet printer for combinatorial libraries and functionally graded ceramics. J Combinat Chem. 2002;4:267–274. [PubMed]
20. Beeson R. Thermal (TIJ) or Piezo? Who cares?; IMI 7th Annual Ink Jet Printing Conference; 1998.
21. Hock SW, Johnson DA, Van Veen MA. Print quality optimization for a color ink-jet printer by using a larger nozzle for the black ink only. US5521622. 1996
22. Canfield B, Clayton H, Yeung KWW. Method and apparatus for reducing the size of drops ejected from a thermal ink jet printhead. US5673069. 1997
23. Hudson KR, Cowan PB, Gondek JS. Ink drop volume variance compensation for inkjet printing. US6042211. 2000
24. de Jong J, de Bruin G, Reinten H, van den Berg M, Wijshoff H, Versluis M, et al. Air entrapment in piezo-driven inkjet printheads. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;120:1257–1265.
25. Sirringhaus H, Kawase T, Friend RH, Shimoda T, Inbasekaran M, Wu W, et al. High-resolution inkjet printing of all-polymer transistor circuits. Science. 2000;290:2123–2126. [PubMed]
26. Okamoto T, Suzuki T, Yamamoto N. Microarray fabrication with covalent attachment of DNA using bubble jet technology. Nature Biotechnol. 2000;18:438–441. [PubMed]
27. Goldmann T, Gonzalez JS. DNA-printing: Utilization of a standard inkjet printer for the transfer of nucleic acids to solid supports. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2000;42:105–110. [PubMed]
28. Seetharam R, Sharma SK. Purification and analysis of recombinant proteins. Marcel Dekker. 1991:69.
29. Cui X, Dean D, Ruggeri ZM, Boland T. Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010;106:963–969. [PubMed]
30. Mironov V, Visconti RP, Kasyanov V, Forgacs G, Drake CJ, Markwald RR. Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2164–2174. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Moon S, Hasan SK, Song YS, Xu F, Keles HO, Manzur F, et al. Layer by layer three-dimensional tissue epitaxy by cell-laden hydrogel droplets. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:157–166. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Odde DJ, Renn MJ. Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1999;17:385–389. [PubMed]
33. Odde DJ, Renn MJ. Laser-guided direct writing of living cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000;67:312–318. [PubMed]
34. Barron JA, Wu P, Ladouceur HD, Ringeisen BR. Biological laser printing: A novel technique for creating heterogeneous 3-dimensional cell patterns. Biomed Microdevices. 2004;6:139–147. [PubMed]
35. Buskirk WA, Hackleman DE, Hall ST, Kanarek PH, Low RN, Trueba KE, et al. Development of a high-resolution thermal inkjet printhead. Hewlett-Packard J. 1988;39:55–61.
36. Tirella A, Vozzi F, De MC, Vozzi G, Sandri T, Sassano D, et al. Substrate stiffness influences high resolution printing of living cells with an ink-jet system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;112:79–85. [PubMed]
37. Xu T, Rohozinski J, Zhao W, Moorefield EC, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Inkjet-mediated gene transfection into living cells combined with targeted delivery. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:95–101. [PubMed]
38. Mow VC, Hayes WC. Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.
39. Rasanen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, Marja B, Ryynanen OP, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthopaedica. 2007;78:108–115. [PubMed]
40. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. New Eng J Medicine. 1994;331:889–895. [PubMed]
41. Hunziker EB. Articular cartilage repair: Basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10:432–463. [PubMed]
42. Kalson NS, Gikas PD, Briggs TWR. Current strategies for knee cartilage repair. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:1444–1452. [PubMed]
43. Shapiro F, Koide S, Glimcher MJ. Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular-cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg-American Vol. 1993;75A:532–553. [PubMed]
44. Elisseeff J, McIntosh W, Anseth K, Riley S, Ragan P, Langer R. Photoencapsulation of chondrocytes in poly(ethylene oxide)-based semi-interpenetrating networks. J Biomedical Materials Res. 2000;51:164–171. [PubMed]
45. Bryant SJ, Anseth KS. Hydrogel properties influence ECM production by chondrocytes photoencapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. J Biomedical Materials Res. 2002;59:63–72. [PubMed]
46. Bryant SJ, Chowdhury TT, Lee DA, Bader DL, Anseth KS. Crosslinking density influences chondrocyte metabolism in dynamically loaded photocrosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32:407–417. [PubMed]
47. Kim TK, Sharma B, Williams CG, Ruffner MA, Malik A, McFarland EG, et al. Experimental model for cartilage tissue engineering to regenerate the zonal organization of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11:653–664. [PubMed]
48. Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn MG, Lotz MK, D’Lima DD. Direct human cartilage repair using 3D bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Sharma B, Williams CG, Kim TK, Sun DN, Malik A, Khan M, et al. Designing zonal organization into tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:405–414. [PubMed]
50. Buxton AN, Bahney CS, Yoo JU, Johnstone B. Temporal exposure to chondrogenic factors modulates human mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis in hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:371–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Grogan SP, Barbero A, Winkelmann V, Rieser F, Fitzsimmons JS, O’Driscoll S, et al. Visual histological grading system for the evaluation of in vitro-generated neocartilage. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2141–2149. [PubMed]
52. Yaeger PC, Masi TL, de Ortiz JL, Binette F, Tubo R, McPherson JM. Synergistic action of transforming growth factor-beta and insulin-like growth factor-I induces expression of type II collagen and aggrecan genes in adult human articular chondrocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1997;237:318–325. [PubMed]
53. Jakob M, Demarteau O, Schafer D, Hintermann B, Dick W, Heberer M, et al. Specific growth factors during the expansion and redifferentiation of adult human articular chondrocytes enhance chondrogenesis and cartilaginous tissue formation in vitro. J Cell Biochem. 2001;81:368–377. [PubMed]
54. Mandl EW, van d V, Verhaar JA, Van Osch GJ. Serum-free medium supplemented with high-concentration FGF2 for cell expansion culture of human ear chondrocytes promotes redifferentiation capacity. Tissue Eng. 2002;8:573–580. [PubMed]
55. Mandl EW, Jahr H, Koevoet JL, van Leeuwen JP, Weinans H, Verhaar JA, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-2 in serum-free medium is a potent mitogen and reduces dedifferentiation of human ear chondrocytes in monolayer culture. Matrix Biol. 2004;23:231–241. [PubMed]
56. Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Lotz MK, D’Lima DD. Synergistic action of fibroblast growth factor-2 and transforming growth factor-beta1 enhances bioprinted human neocartilage formation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Catros S, Guillemot F, Nandakumar A, Ziane S, Moroni L, Habibovic P, et al. Layer-by-layer tissue microfabrication supports cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012;18:62–70. [PubMed]
58. Cui X, Boland T. Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6221–6227. [PubMed]
59. Burri PH, Hlushchuk R, Djonov V. Intussusceptive angiogenesis: Its emergence, its characteristics, and its significance. Dev Dyn. 2004;231:474–488. [PubMed]
60. Currie LJ, Sharpe JR, Martin R. The use of fibrin glue in skin grafts and tissue-engineered skin replacements: A review. Plast Reconstruc Surg. 2001;108:1713–1726. [PubMed]
61. Fussenegger M, Meinhart J, Hobling W, Kullich W, Funk S, Bernatzky G. Stabilized autologous fibrin-chondrocyte constructs for cartilage repair in vivo. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:493–498. [PubMed]
62. Janmey PA. Kinetics of formation of fibrin oligomers. I. Theory. Biopolymers. 1982;21:2253–2264. [PubMed]
63. Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:585–601. [PubMed]
64. Huang YC, Dennis RG, Larkin L, Baar K. Rapid formation of functional muscle in vitro using fibrin gels. J App Physiol. 2005;98:706–713. [PubMed]
65. Hecker L, Khait L, Welsh MJ, Birla R. Bioengineering functional human aortic vascular smooth-muscle strips in vitro. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2008;50:155–163. [PubMed]
66. Perka C, Spitzer RS, Lindenhayn K, Sittinger M, Schultz O. Matrix-mixed culture: New methodology for chondrocyte culture and preparation of cartilage transplants. J Biomed Materials Res. 2000;49:305–311. [PubMed]

About Timothytrespas

I am a victim of human experimentation MK-ultra mind control Morgellons nanotechnology syndrome & remote neural connectivity. I am an artist, inventor, musician, thinker, lover, human being who cares for all humanity & all life. I believe people should endeavor to live in peaceful cooperation rather than brutal waring survival of the most brutal. We live in a forced false-paradigm and I desire to wake people up from the 'trance hypnotic mind control programming' to the 'TRUTH of light and love'! Blessing and peace. Justice to all who suffer under tyranny. Compassion for all beings. May GOD have mercy on us all.
This entry was posted in stories of secret torture, tracking and murder, in and by the U.S.A. intelligence community and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Science targeted individuals may find interesting: Thermal Inkjet Printing in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

  1. kdurschmidt says:

    TimothyTrespas: Go to Dr. Hildy (Hildigard Staninger) she can get & give you all the naturalpathic protocol, as she gave me, to rid yourself of these Morgellons/Bioware Weapons!! You don’t even need to go in person, she heard my case/problems/symptoms over a phone consult, and treated and send me the protocol, and I am now healing and taking her natualpathy remedies and proper diet to rid myself of Morgellons/Biowarefare/found in GMO foods too and Chem trails..the Illumi”naughties” really did it up BIG this time!! Glad the Annunakii’s or Sumarians, are watching and ready to “take them out”…come on down: Nibiru!!! Help us perg the Illumi”naughties” !!! You can call me Tim: after 8pm please as I work on research during day and such/ and get my sleep in morning, as I am up all night at time too!! 480-786-8883

    Like

  2. kdurschmidt says:

    Dear Teimothytrespass, I hope you get this email! I’m a TI (Targeted Individual) for those who don’t know or understand this crap. I read your info. above, I still don’t understand how “we can heal or download” this 3D inkjet “program” to heal or regenerate from the torture, death attempts and radiation/micorwaves they use on me (and you!!??”)..I want you to know about several other sites and one TI networking site we meet in person, too!! The more we stay strong and together to fight them, then we will win..such as how it took decades of large numbered protests, lobbying, lawsuits and activism, before gays and other Civil Rights Groups, WIN!! I feel like this is too far over the top and evil, and “murder/tortue” should be “PRIORITY” IN THE USA SUPREME COURT CASES TO BE HEARD AND STOPPED, the most hightest and fundament right in the USA and Earth: our life, libery and Freedom!!..It’s gone, and Earth leaders may pay the price, as Nibiru leaders and Galactic Members, are NOT going to tolerate the “imprisionment and torture and death” of Earth Inhibitatans by the Evil Bank and IllumiNAUGTIES!!!
    NETWORK with up on http://www.peacepink.ning.com, befriend me their: Ms. Kris Durschmidt, and see and subscribe to my Youtube:An American being Tortured on American Soil by the American Governemnt. Our facebook site: Targeted Individuals Evidence Collection and Meetup.com, Targeted Individuals and Human Rights Advocates. http://www.meetup.com/TARGETED-INDIVIDUALS-and-HUMAN-RIGHTS-ADVOCATES/
    ..or call after 8pm to network, if you wish: Ms. Kris 11plus yr TI, now living in Chandler, Az, USA 480-786-8883…Love and light: See Youtube: Rife Frequency for Targeted Individuals and DNA Repair Healing Frequencies..

    Like

  3. our website says:

    I’m suggested your blog via the relative. I’m no more positive irrespective of whether this particular create is definitely created by method of him or her as no one fully grasp this kind of actual roughly this problem. You are amazing! Appreciate it!

    Like

I would love to hear your thoughts and opinion in these issues. Please Leave a Reply:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s